Every month I receive a variety of questions from salespeople and their managers. These come from a variety of sources - my live seminars, the monthly phone seminars, questions that are sent into my newsletter, and issues that arise in the course of my consulting work. Out of all of these, I select those that I think have the most universal application, and respond to them here.
I sell advertising for a local newspaper. In our pay plan, we compete with our revenue numbers from the previous year, and approximately 6% is added to the previous year's revenue number. That becomes your goal for that particular month. We get a salary plus commission and have a stair step commission that starts at 80% of our goal. The problem is, there is no motivation between the sales people due to the fact that we are competing with numbers from the year before. When we have talked to management about it, they say that if we changed the pay plan, we would have to lower salaries. In most months our company keeps approximately 92% to 96% of the total revenue I bring in. I'd like to know your thoughts on this kind of pay plan.
I suspect that this kind of question lurks in the back of the minds of many salespeople -- "Is my pay plan fair?"
I've been on both sides of this issue. As a salesperson, I've worked under a number of different compensation plans. In every sales position I had, my compensation plan was changed at least once.
As a consultant, helping companies refine their compensation plan is a regular part of my practice. Almost never does a week go by that I'm not involved in a compensation plan project somewhere.
Over the years, I've developed some criteria for evaluating a compensation plan. Here's one of them: A good compensation plan should be a win-win plan. That means, good for the salesperson and good for the company.
From the salesperson's perspective, that means that the compensation plan should be competitive with others in the market, that it should fairly compensate them, and that it should financially reward exceptional performance.
From the company's point of view, it means the same things, with one provision: A good compensation plan should cost the company an appropriate amount of the gross profit generated by the sales force.
There is, unfortunately, a good deal of misunderstanding on the part of sales people on the economics of business. Your statement that the company "Keeps 92-96% of the revenue you generate" is an indication of that misunderstanding. You are implying that the money is yours, totally due to your efforts. I can empathize with this feeling, because for years, I shared it.
However, a more reasoned investigation into the issue will reveal that you are just one part of the company. The people who reliably turn out every edition of your newspaper -- who distribute it, who pay the bills and run the presses -- are just as much a part of the reason your advertisers choose to spend their money with your paper. To say that the company keeps the money you generate is to over-inflate your contribution.
Secondly, you are implying that something is wrong with that percentage. I don't think so. If the company pays you 6% to 8% of the revenue from your accounts, that seems to me to be in the range of what they can afford to pay and still be profitable.
FREE 30-page "Handling Objections" workbook. Just join Dave's information packed "Thinking About Sales" ezine, also FREE!
|
In any well-run company, out of ever dollar of revenue, the company must pay all of their costs. Sales costs is just one such category of cost. On top of that comes, of course, the cost of goods sold, the rent or building costs, executive and administrative costs, other marketing costs, all of the other workers in the company, costs of maintaining accounts receivable, costs of borrowing money, etc. When all of these costs are in line, the company may make a profit, typically between 1% to 5% of the total revenue. If any of these costs get out of line, it hurts the company, in many cases causing it to be unprofitable.
Keep in mind that your cost to the company is far greater than the take home pay you receive. Add in the costs to train you, the fringe benefits the company provides, the taxes they pay on your behalf, and the expenses they pay on your behalf -- like cell phones and car allowances, etc. As a rough general rule, take your total gross income, and add about 40% to get a better idea of what you actually cost the company. So, in other words, if you grossed $50,000 last year, add 40%, or an additional $20,000 and that will approximate what you actually cost the company. Probably closer to $70,000.
Now, the company is paying you 8 - 12% of the gross income it receives. For a service company like yours, I don't think this is out of line. Other kinds of companies, like distributors and retailers, would go put of business paying sales costs that high.
Let's assume, for purposes of the illustration, that the products and services you sell have a 40% gross profit. In other words, for every $100 in income, it actually costs your company $60.00 to deliver that product/service. If we work the numbers out, 8 - 12% of gross revenue, at a gross profit of 40%, equals sales costs of 20- 32% of gross profit. In other words, you are costing the company somewhere between 1/5 to 1/3 of all the money that is available to the company to pay all its expenses and make a profit.
Depending on some other factors, this is in the range of what I would expect it to be. If you work for a distributor or retailer, this is too high. If you work for a manufacturer or service provider, you are in the range.
Any company that pays more than 35% of its gross profit in sales costs is in danger of being unprofitable.
So, while this little analysis is based on averages and rules-of-thumb and not your company's numbers, it does indicate that you are probably not being underpaid relative to your contribution.
So, the question really has to do with the format of the compensation plan. Is salary plus incentive a more effective, win/win approach than 100% commission?
Without knowing your circumstances, I really can't speculate. But, let me say that in mature markets, I favor the salary plus incentive format over the 100% commission plan for a number of reasons.
All of that said, at least on the surface of things, I can not find fault with your company's compensation plan. The real issue here is this: What do you do about a compensation plan that you feel is not effective?
If you believe that your plan is not fair or effective, then you have some decisions to make. I think you have only two options:
- First, express your opinions to the company's management. Back up your case with some substance. Try to sell them on your opinion in the same way that you'd try to sell a customer on the value of your products or services. Keep in mind, however, that you are just one part of the company, and that there is a limited amount of the whole pie that the company can afford in sales costs and still remain a viable, growing company.
If you are successful in getting them to revise your plan, congratulations.
- If you are not, then you need to pursue option two: Decide if you can live with this plan or not. If not, then look for another position. If so, then chalk it up to experience, be thankful for the position you have, and continue on.
I don't think you ever have the option of fomenting rancor and discontent. Be black or white on this. If you can't embrace the opportunity you have and whole-heartedly pursue it, then you owe it to yourself and your company to find something else. What is not an option is continuing in your current position and spending time and energy complaining about your compensation plan.
Good luck!
- * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * -
If you have any comments or questions, email them to me. I do, of course, reserve the right to edit.
Here are a few articles by Dave
that you might be interested in reading:
- TIs it Time to Revise Your Sales Compensation Plan?...
If you're paying your sales reps straight commission, you're using an obsolete formula. If you're paying your sales reps a straight salary, you're also using an obsolete formula. Read this article to find out a much more effective way to compensate your sales staff.... {Read More}
- Sales Management Myths: Straight Commission...
I had just hung up from a phone conversation with one of my clients. He was commiserating with me on the sorry state of his sales force. He had a group of seasoned, experienced salespeople, each of whom was making a good income on a 100% commission compensation plan. The problem was he couldn't get them to promote new products or seek new customers. They were content to stay within their comfort zones of established customers and familiar products. That contentment is more typical than most of us are willing to admit. Many sales managers and principals continue to strive under the myth that sales people are forever motivated to sell ever larger quantities. And we attribute much of that motivation to the 100% commission compensation plan. Unfortunately, straight commission plans rarely motivate an established sales force to sell more!.... {Read More}
There are also many other action-packed articles for sales professionals that offer how-to solutions to every day sales problems that you can read online at www.davekahle.com/article.htm.
How to Create A Win/Win Sales Compensation Plan
How to Find, Interview, Select and Hire a Good Salesperson
Creating a new sales compensation plan and hiring new salespeople can be two of the most critical decisions you have to make. Let Dave Kahle help. In this combined package for managers, Dave addresses both of these very tough issues and offers you a complete system to deal with each.
This package will show you how to...
* look between the lines of a resume
* organize the territory before you make the hire
* find, interview, select and hire the best salespeople
* measure the sales productivity of your salesforce and every sales person
* create a company wide sales compensation plan that is a win/win for everyone.
* And much, much more... Click here to see a complete package outline.
This is a complete solution for the company that has to hire salespeople and figure out how to pay them.
Only $150 ~ Buy it Now!
|
10 Secrets of Time Management for Salespeople
The typical salesperson today is overwhelmed, trapped in a chaotic, pressure-filled environment with too much to do and not enough time to do it. Salespeople need help! This book provides it.
Dave Kahle contends that smart time management is not about cramming more activity into each hour; but about achieving greater results in that hour. The content has been honed in hundreds of seminars and refined by the perceptions and experiences of thousands of salespeople.
10 Secrets of Time Management for Salespeople provides powerful, practical insights and ideas that really work, including hundreds of specific, practical, effective time management tips from dozens of salespeople who are on the "front lines" every day.
Buy it Now!
|
|